Thursday, September 01, 2005

My Own Darwin Award

I'm sure that most of you have heard of the Darwin Awards. It's the award given each year to those idiots who have done the world a favor by removing themselves from the gene pool. I would like to name every idiot who has gotten hooked on crack, heroine, methamphetamines, or any hard drugs in the last ten years. With all the information available on how harmful, addictive, and potentially fatal these narcotics are, if you were dumb enough to try them anyway than the gene pool can do without you.

After the way Heroine ravaged the ghettoes and then finally even mainstream america in the fifties, sixties and seventies, if you were dumb enough to try it in the eighties and nineties then you are an idiot. If you tried crack cocaine in the late eighties you could almost be forgiven the way the media was almost running a promotional campaign for it. I remember hearing about crack for the first time on the radio. The broadcast went something like this: "There's a new drug hitting the streets, a type of freebase cocaine called Crack that is said to be six times stronger than regular cocaine and twice as addictive. It's also much cheaper." I heard the same thing on the six o'clock news that evening. The next day I was walking down Germantown avenue in Philadelphia, which at the time was sort of an open air drug market, and everyone up there was clamoring for Crack. The day before it was caps of cocaine, then the media hype machine steps in and overnight it had become the hottest drug on the street thanks to those wonderful crack commercials. So millions of people all over America tried it and got hopelessly addicted. But this was in '86. By the end of '88 everyone was well acquainted with crackheads. Everyone in the ghetto had seen the prettiest girl and school reduced to sucking cocks for a hit of rock. Everyone had seen the toughest guy on the block reduced to sucking cocks for a hit of rock. So, if you lived in the ghetto after '88 and you tried cocaine for the first time in the nineties, you are an idiot.

I have often excused those people who grew up in the suburbs or in small towns who got hooked on crack in the early nineties when it first expanded from the ghettoes into middle-america. It's possible that you just didn't know that you were messing with something dangerously addictive, life-threatening, and stupid. It's possible that you hadn't heard about kids dropping dead after just one hit, athletes dropping dead on the basketball court because of smoking it, and people getting so helplessly addicted that they lost their jobs and had to sell all of their possessions, the possessions of all their friends, family, and neighbors, and then finally their own bodies to support their habits. If you lived in a town with a population of less than a million and you got hooked on crack before 1995 than ignorance can almost be your excuse. After '95 if you got hooked on crack then you are an idiot, because by then the news media had reported the devastation caused by crack so heavily that you would have had to have been living under a rock not to know how terrible the drug was. Even hollywood had picked up on it and there were crack heads on the silver screen. There were movie stars getting hooked on it and even the mayor of DC. There was nowhere you could go in America and not see or hear about crack. So, if you still tried it, guess what? You are an idiot.

And anyone who has tried any illegal narcotic whatsoever in the new millenium is a waste of human intellect best shed from the gene pool. Here is where I show my one conservative leaning. I agreed with the LA Police Chief back in the early nineties when he said, "Casual drug users should be taken out and shot." I agree. They are all idiots. There's nothing casual about illegal drugs. Nothing fun and safe and harmless. Methamphetamines, Exstasy, Ketamine, painkillers, all of the crutches of the intellectual and emotional lowest common denominator. I don't care if you are poor and oppressed or abused or neglected or bored, you should be smart enough to know that drugs only make it worse. If you live anywhere in America today then you know that drug use has never improved anyone's standard of living.

There are some of you agreeing with me right now and some of you who think I'm being too harsh, too judgemental, unsympathetic, blah, blah, blah. I could give a fuck. My blog. My opinion. Look at how fucked up the inner city is and if it doesn't make you angry, if it doesn't make you question the intelligence of those who keep the drug trade running profitably year after year, than you are perhaps not judgemental enough.

I lost my very best friend to drugs. When we lived on the streets of Philly together I once threatened to kill him because he was drinking beer everyday after school. I told him that I would rather see him dead than a drunk. Then one day he tried crack. While in the middle of telling me how great it felt, I kicked his ass. I beat him like I owned him. No, I beat him like I loved him because I did. He was the closest thing I'd ever had to a brother. While I was holding him down on the sidewalk and choking the life out of him I told him to let me know if he wanted to die because I would oblige him right then and there, but I wouldn't let him kill himself with drugs. Then we grew up and I moved to California and he moved to England. And he called me one day and told me he was in serious trouble, federal trouble, and needed my help. I naturally assumed it was drug-related though I didn't ask. I bought him a ticket from England to San Francisco and the minute he stepped off the plane I knew he was hooked on something, something he would have never touched if I had been around to kick his ass again. I know, I can't take responsibility for other people's fucked up decisions but I can't help it. I was happy, healthy, and successful and he was fleeing prosecution and hopelessly addicted. I should have taken him to Cali with me in the first place. We were twenty-one years old and should have both been enjoying our lives to the fullest not running from international drug enforcement with a monkey on his back the size of King Kong. The day after he arrived in California he dissapeared and I have never seen him since. I can only assume that he is dead. I get pissed off every time I think about it. I don't understand how someone so smart could be so stupid. He grew up seeing the same shit everyday that I saw. He saw kids shot in driveby shootings. He saw crackheads selling pussy for five dollars on the street. He saw kids we grew up with utterly destroyed by drugs and his stupid ass still tried it. Now every time I think about the times we laughed together while we were growing up, every time I think about all the fun we had and all the trouble we got into, I have to think about the very real probability that he is either dead or in jail or some homeless drug addict somewhere mumbling to himself in an alley, or shouting at shadows beneath a freeway underpass. Fuck him for being so weak. Fuck him for being so damned stupid. Fuck him straight to hell.

Truth be told I feel the same way about alcohol and nicotine too. How many more studies do we have to have showing how dangerous these substances are to your health? How higher do they have to raise the price of beer and cigarettes before people decide that this money would be better spent on their families? Trips to Disney World, a college fund for your kids, a romantic dinner for your wife. You don't smoke and drink that much? One beer and a pack of cigarettes a day and you are spending two hundred dollars a month or more. Two beers and you are almost up to three hundred. My kid's college fund costs one hundred and eighty-five a month. Add cocktails on the weekends and a little weed and you could have put a down payment on a house in a year. Which is more important? If you answered getting drunk and smoking you can pick up your Darwin award from me at the next convention.

2 comments:

Maura said...

I'm a recovered methamphetamine addict. I first started using it in 92, when I was fifteen. While it's true that there was information about meth back then, I was a teenager, and the only resource I had though which to learn about drugs was the "drug education" provided by my public schools. Drug education failed me utterly.

I recall a cop coming to our classroom in fifth grade to teach us about drugs. He told us about several different varieties of drugs, but only told us that they were all unequivocally bad. "This is PCP. It's bad. This is LSD. It's bad. This is marijuana. It's the most dangerous and deadly drug of all." When someone asked him what the effects of the drugs were, he would only tell us the negative side effects of each, but told us absolutely nothing about the effects of the drugs themselves. I raised my hand and asked, "If drugs do all these terrible things to people, why do they use them in the first place?" He just shook his head sadly and said he didn't know.

I knew he was full of shit, and that he was deliberately witholding information from us. I wasn't a stupid kid. Even when I was ten years old, I questioned everything I was told. I knew that drugs had to have some positive effect (relatively speaking), otherwise people would not do them. But there was no one in my life who would give it to me straight.

So I found out for myself. My first drug experience was a large dose of LSD. I had no idea at all what it would do to me. Over the next few years I kept experimenting with other substances, all the while avoiding marijuana like the plague, thinking it was the worst of the lot. Eventually I became hooked on meth.

I've been clean for nine years now. Breaking my addiction was the single hardest thing I've ever done. Ironically, it was marijuana that was my "gateway drug" - a gateway out. That's what I used to help me break the hold meth had over me. I still use pot today, but with a doctor's recommendation. I don't use it to make myself stupid, but to alleviate the pain and nausea of migraines. I use as much as I need, and no more.

I never would have tried these drugs if someone had just been honest with me from the start. If we want kids to be able to make informed descisions to stay away from drugs, we need to be honest with them. This policy of lies and withholding information is not only outdated, it is dangerous.

Having been down that road myself, I'm a little more forgiving than you are, although I understand where you're coming from. I didn't have the same obvious examples as you did of what happened to people who used drugs. Now that we have the internet, kids can find out whatever they need to know about it, although they also need to be mature enough to be able to weed out the facts from the wild misinformation that's presented on many vehemently anti-drug websites.

By the way, I've decided not to breed, so you needn't worry about the gene pool on my account. ;)

Wrath said...

I agree that drug education needs to improve. I think it has to be honest and open and not hold anything back. When I was a kid we got shown movie reels of people over-dosing on heroine, going through heroine withdrawal, dying etc. We were shown a video of a woman who fried her baby to death on the stove while tripping on PCP because she thought he was Satan. Then somewhere along the way some liberal idiot decided these videos were too harsh for our kids and they were left to fend for themselves with the help of officer friendly. Kids are stupid though and while the message came through loud and clear to not mess with THOSE drugs that we saw on the movie reels some people assumed that Cocaine and every other drug not specifically mentioned was still okay. Luckily, I lumped them all together as equally bad and stayed away from all of them.

One of the biggest problems with combating drug abuse is how permissive our society has become to drug use. When I moved to California in early 1990 everyone I spoke to was shocked when they found out I'd never used drugs. For so many drug abuse was looked upon as a normal part of growing up. It was assumed that you'd use drugs through college and maybe into your twenties. If you got hooked your employer or the good taxpayers of California would pay for you to go to rehab. Then you'd get out and just pick up your life where it left off. No harm. No foul. That's disgusting and wrong. How can you teach your kids not to use drugs when his teachers at school are former drug users/abusers, his friend's parents are past or present users, and even his boss at his first job is a former cokehead? This is what needs to change. The normalcy and acceptability of it. Kids need to be shown the unpleasant consequences of thier decisions. The kid gloves with which we treat those who use and abuse need to come off. Our kids grow up and see this apparent lack of consequences for such idiotic mistakes and they think it works out that way for everybody. Some people don't recover. Some people don't survive. It is not a normal part of growing up it is a horrible disgusting disease that we as a society have failed miserably at curing.

I think that a program that, as you suggested, described the euphoric effects of narcotics along with the penalty you pay for this euphoria would be far more effective. Teenagers being teenagers will tend to think that they are just being lied to or not told the entire truth and go out and try it for themselves if you hold anything back. I also think that 99% of this education needs to come from the parents. If they don't know enough about drugs to properly educate thier kids than they need to find out. This is the information age and there is simply no longer any excuse for ignorance.

Congrats on getting clean. I know that is not an easy thing to do. And I truly hope you are able to remain clean. You are one of the lucky ones.